tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-873311900923207764.post1468667660498164920..comments2008-07-01T14:00:48.868-04:00Chris Dupuishttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05510027692530959761noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-873311900923207764.post-12473929946035629702008-07-01T13:40:00.000-04:002008-07-01T13:40:00.000-04:00

Hey, Chris.<BR/>Nice post. Very intelligent and well thought out. <BR/>I am a publicist for theatre in Vancouver, and it is my job to get the local (I'm not sure whether to call them) reviewers/critics out to my shows. I have fielded many a frantic phone call the morning of a bad review. It's tough: you put yourself out there, and you need reviews to give your company a sense of legitimacy. But a

Rebecca Colemanhttp://www.titaniaproductions.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-873311900923207764.post-71556096444398325752008-06-29T10:16:00.000-04:002008-06-29T10:16:00.000-04:00

I enjoyed reading this piece Chris, and completely agree. You have been very generous in your thoughts. Now, can you send this to all the major 'reviewers' so that they can also read it! I might add, that I find it disturbing that most major publications in this country still don't know who to send out to interdisciplinary shows and often they are 'judged' (reviewed), rather than criticized,

Ciara Adamshttp://www.ciaraadams.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-873311900923207764.post-20876088912396601222008-06-28T18:47:00.000-04:002008-06-28T18:47:00.000-04:00

Really great piece Chris. I'd add that regardless of what kind of reviewing is happening in the press, we should be expecting the same kind of complexity from each other as artists when talking about each other's work. We should expect each other to be well-read and to have a depth of reference points within our craft, across the arts and socially, politically, etc., so that we're not just making

Daniel Karasiknoreply@blogger.com